Dergi makalesi Açık Erişim

Microbial Inactivation by Non-equilibrium Short-Pulsed Atmospheric Pressure Dielectric Barrier Discharge (Cold Plasma): Numerical and Experimental Studies

Arserim, Ender H.; Salvi, Deepti; Fridman, Gregory; Schaffner, Donald W.; Karwe, Mukund V.


DataCite XML

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="URL">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/9597</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Arserim, Ender H.</creatorName>
      <givenName>Ender H.</givenName>
      <familyName>Arserim</familyName>
      <affiliation>Rutgers State Univ, Dept Food Sci, 65 Dudley Rd, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Salvi, Deepti</creatorName>
      <givenName>Deepti</givenName>
      <familyName>Salvi</familyName>
      <affiliation>Rutgers State Univ, Dept Food Sci, 65 Dudley Rd, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Fridman, Gregory</creatorName>
      <givenName>Gregory</givenName>
      <familyName>Fridman</familyName>
      <affiliation>Drexel Univ, C&amp;J Nyheim Plasma Inst, 200 Fed St,Suite 500, Camden, NJ 08103 USA</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Schaffner, Donald W.</creatorName>
      <givenName>Donald W.</givenName>
      <familyName>Schaffner</familyName>
      <affiliation>Rutgers State Univ, Dept Food Sci, 65 Dudley Rd, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Karwe, Mukund V.</creatorName>
      <givenName>Mukund V.</givenName>
      <familyName>Karwe</familyName>
      <affiliation>Rutgers State Univ, Dept Food Sci, 65 Dudley Rd, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>Microbial Inactivation By Non-Equilibrium Short-Pulsed Atmospheric Pressure Dielectric Barrier Discharge (Cold Plasma): Numerical And Experimental Studies</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Aperta</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2020</publicationYear>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2020-01-01</date>
  </dates>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Journal article</resourceType>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/9597</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsIdenticalTo">10.1007/s12393-020-09256-7</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by">Creative Commons Attribution</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">Microbial inactivation efficacy of plasma generated by a custom-made floating electrode dielectric barrier discharge (FE-DBD) or cold plasma at three different frequencies (1 kHz, 2 kHz, and 3.5 kHz) was experimentally evaluated for its inactivation of the pathogen surrogateEnterobacter aerogeneson a glass surface to obtain inactivation kinetics. COMSOL Multiphysics (R) was used to numerically simulate the amount and the distribution of reactive species within an FE-DBD system. Microbial inactivation kinetics was predicted using species concentrations and microbial inactivation rates from the literature and compared with experimental data. The results showed that the FE-DBD plasma treatment achieved a microbial reduction of 4.3 +/- 0.5 log CFU/surface at 3.5 kHz, 5.1 +/- 0.09 log CFU/surface at 2 kHz, and 5.1 +/- 0.05 log CFU/surface at 1 kHz in 2 min, 3 min, and 6 min, respectively. The predicted values were 4.02 log CFU/surface, 4.10 log CFU/surface, and 4.56 log CFU/surface at 1 kHz, 2 kHz, and 3.5 kHz, respectively. A maximum 1 log difference was observed between numerical predictions and the experimental results. The difference might be due to synergistic interactions between plasma species, UV component of FE-DBD plasma, and/or the electrical field effects, which could not be included in the numerical simulation.</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>
32
7
görüntülenme
indirilme
Görüntülenme 32
İndirme 7
Veri hacmi 1.8 kB
Tekil görüntülenme 31
Tekil indirme 7

Alıntı yap