1 Ocak 2017 Dergi makalesi Açık Erişim

Cilden Guler, Demet; Conguroglu, Ece S.; Hajiyev, Chingiz

Dublin Core

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Cilden Guler, Demet</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Conguroglu, Ece S.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Hajiyev, Chingiz</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017-01-01</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Single-frame methods of determining the attitude of a nanosatellite are compared in this study. The methods selected for comparison are: Single Value Decomposition (SVD), q method, Quaternion ESTimator (QUEST), Fast Optimal Attitude Matrix (FOAM) - all solving optimally the Wahba's problem, and the algebraic method using only two vector measurements. For proper comparison, two sensors are chosen for the vector observations on-board: magnetometer and Sun sensors. Covariance results obtained as a result of using those methods have a critical importance for a non-traditional attitude estimation approach; therefore, the variance calculations are also presented. The examined methods are compared with respect to their root mean square (RMS) error and variance results. Also, some recommendations are given.</dc:description>
  <dc:identifier>https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.trrecord/48259</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>oai:zenodo.org:48259</dc:identifier>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>METROLOGY AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS 24(2) 313-324</dc:source>
  <dc:title>SINGLE-FRAME ATTITUDE DETERMINATION METHODS FOR NANOSATELLITES</dc:title>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:type>publication-article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>