1 Ocak 2017 Dergi makalesi Açık Erişim

Cilden Guler, Demet; Conguroglu, Ece S.; Hajiyev, Chingiz

JSON-LD (schema.org)

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org/", 
  "@id": 48259, 
  "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
  "creator": [
    {
      "@type": "Person", 
      "affiliation": "Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey", 
      "name": "Cilden Guler, Demet"
    }, 
    {
      "@type": "Person", 
      "affiliation": "Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey", 
      "name": "Conguroglu, Ece S."
    }, 
    {
      "@type": "Person", 
      "affiliation": "Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey", 
      "name": "Hajiyev, Chingiz"
    }
  ], 
  "datePublished": "2017-01-01", 
  "description": "Single-frame methods of determining the attitude of a nanosatellite are compared in this study. The methods selected for comparison are: Single Value Decomposition (SVD), q method, Quaternion ESTimator (QUEST), Fast Optimal Attitude Matrix (FOAM) - all solving optimally the Wahba's problem, and the algebraic method using only two vector measurements. For proper comparison, two sensors are chosen for the vector observations on-board: magnetometer and Sun sensors. Covariance results obtained as a result of using those methods have a critical importance for a non-traditional attitude estimation approach; therefore, the variance calculations are also presented. The examined methods are compared with respect to their root mean square (RMS) error and variance results. Also, some recommendations are given.", 
  "headline": "SINGLE-FRAME ATTITUDE DETERMINATION METHODS FOR NANOSATELLITES", 
  "identifier": 48259, 
  "image": "https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/static/img/logo/aperta_logo_with_icon.svg", 
  "license": "http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by", 
  "name": "SINGLE-FRAME ATTITUDE DETERMINATION METHODS FOR NANOSATELLITES", 
  "url": "https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/48259"
}