Dergi makalesi Açık Erişim
Cilden Guler, Demet; Conguroglu, Ece S.; Hajiyev, Chingiz
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
<identifier identifierType="URL">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/48259</identifier>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Cilden Guler, Demet</creatorName>
<givenName>Demet</givenName>
<familyName>Cilden Guler</familyName>
<affiliation>Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey</affiliation>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName>Conguroglu, Ece S.</creatorName>
<givenName>Ece S.</givenName>
<familyName>Conguroglu</familyName>
<affiliation>Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey</affiliation>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName>Hajiyev, Chingiz</creatorName>
<givenName>Chingiz</givenName>
<familyName>Hajiyev</familyName>
<affiliation>Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey</affiliation>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title>Single-Frame Attitude Determination Methods For Nanosatellites</title>
</titles>
<publisher>Aperta</publisher>
<publicationYear>2017</publicationYear>
<dates>
<date dateType="Issued">2017-01-01</date>
</dates>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Journal article</resourceType>
<alternateIdentifiers>
<alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/48259</alternateIdentifier>
</alternateIdentifiers>
<relatedIdentifiers>
<relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsIdenticalTo">10.1515/mms-2017-0023</relatedIdentifier>
</relatedIdentifiers>
<rightsList>
<rights rightsURI="http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by">Creative Commons Attribution</rights>
<rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
</rightsList>
<descriptions>
<description descriptionType="Abstract">Single-frame methods of determining the attitude of a nanosatellite are compared in this study. The methods selected for comparison are: Single Value Decomposition (SVD), q method, Quaternion ESTimator (QUEST), Fast Optimal Attitude Matrix (FOAM) - all solving optimally the Wahba's problem, and the algebraic method using only two vector measurements. For proper comparison, two sensors are chosen for the vector observations on-board: magnetometer and Sun sensors. Covariance results obtained as a result of using those methods have a critical importance for a non-traditional attitude estimation approach; therefore, the variance calculations are also presented. The examined methods are compared with respect to their root mean square (RMS) error and variance results. Also, some recommendations are given.</description>
</descriptions>
</resource>
| Görüntülenme | 58 |
| İndirme | 12 |
| Veri hacmi | 2.0 kB |
| Tekil görüntülenme | 53 |
| Tekil indirme | 11 |