Dergi makalesi Açık Erişim
Cilden Guler, Demet; Conguroglu, Ece S.; Hajiyev, Chingiz
{
"conceptrecid": "48258",
"created": "2021-03-15T22:13:46.561667+00:00",
"doi": "10.1515/mms-2017-0023",
"files": [
{
"bucket": "01e91ce2-3929-4e5a-bc0b-8b171011ac69",
"checksum": "md5:6b055b85fb60849f611050331154c2a1",
"key": "bib-9073dc53-8010-4630-bd10-6ea484fc2760.txt",
"links": {
"self": "https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/api/files/01e91ce2-3929-4e5a-bc0b-8b171011ac69/bib-9073dc53-8010-4630-bd10-6ea484fc2760.txt"
},
"size": 169,
"type": "txt"
}
],
"id": 48259,
"links": {
"badge": "https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/badge/doi/10.1515/mms-2017-0023.svg",
"bucket": "https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/api/files/01e91ce2-3929-4e5a-bc0b-8b171011ac69",
"doi": "https://doi.org/10.1515/mms-2017-0023",
"html": "https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/48259",
"latest": "https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/api/records/48259",
"latest_html": "https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/48259"
},
"metadata": {
"access_right": "open",
"access_right_category": "success",
"communities": [
{
"id": "tubitak-destekli-proje-yayinlari"
}
],
"creators": [
{
"affiliation": "Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey",
"name": "Cilden Guler, Demet"
},
{
"affiliation": "Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey",
"name": "Conguroglu, Ece S."
},
{
"affiliation": "Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey",
"name": "Hajiyev, Chingiz"
}
],
"description": "Single-frame methods of determining the attitude of a nanosatellite are compared in this study. The methods selected for comparison are: Single Value Decomposition (SVD), q method, Quaternion ESTimator (QUEST), Fast Optimal Attitude Matrix (FOAM) - all solving optimally the Wahba's problem, and the algebraic method using only two vector measurements. For proper comparison, two sensors are chosen for the vector observations on-board: magnetometer and Sun sensors. Covariance results obtained as a result of using those methods have a critical importance for a non-traditional attitude estimation approach; therefore, the variance calculations are also presented. The examined methods are compared with respect to their root mean square (RMS) error and variance results. Also, some recommendations are given.",
"doi": "10.1515/mms-2017-0023",
"has_grant": false,
"journal": {
"issue": "2",
"pages": "313-324",
"title": "METROLOGY AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS",
"volume": "24"
},
"license": {
"id": "cc-by"
},
"publication_date": "2017-01-01",
"relations": {
"version": [
{
"count": 1,
"index": 0,
"is_last": true,
"last_child": {
"pid_type": "recid",
"pid_value": "48259"
},
"parent": {
"pid_type": "recid",
"pid_value": "48258"
}
}
]
},
"resource_type": {
"subtype": "article",
"title": "Dergi makalesi",
"type": "publication"
},
"title": "SINGLE-FRAME ATTITUDE DETERMINATION METHODS FOR NANOSATELLITES"
},
"owners": [
1
],
"revision": 1,
"stats": {
"downloads": 12.0,
"unique_downloads": 11.0,
"unique_views": 53.0,
"version_downloads": 12.0,
"version_unique_downloads": 11.0,
"version_unique_views": 53.0,
"version_views": 58.0,
"version_volume": 2028.0,
"views": 58.0,
"volume": 2028.0
},
"updated": "2021-03-15T22:13:46.605206+00:00"
}
| Görüntülenme | 58 |
| İndirme | 12 |
| Veri hacmi | 2.0 kB |
| Tekil görüntülenme | 53 |
| Tekil indirme | 11 |