1 Ocak 2016 Dergi makalesi Açık Erişim

Arslan, Zubeyde Filiz; Williams, Martin M., II; Becker, Roger; Fritz, Vincent A.; Peachey, R. Ed; Rabaey, Tom L.

MARC21 XML

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">user-tubitak-destekli-proje-yayinlari</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:57169</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Atrazine has been the most widely used herbicide in North American processing sweet corn for decades; however, increased restrictions in recent years have reduced or eliminated atrazine use in certain production areas. The objective of this study was to identify the best stakeholder-derived weed management alternatives to atrazine in processing sweet corn. In field trials throughout the major production areas of processing sweet corn, including three states over 4 yr, 12 atrazine-free weed management treatments were compared to three standard atrazine-containing treatments and a weed-free check. Treatments varied with respect to herbicide mode of action, herbicide application timing, and interrow cultivation. All treatments included a PRE application of dimethenamid. No single weed species occurred across all sites; however, weeds observed in two or more sites included common lambsquarters, giant ragweed, morningglory species, velvetleaf, and wild-proso millet. Standard treatments containing both atrazine and mesotrione POST provided the most efficacious weed control among treatments and resulted in crop yields comparable to the weed-free check, thus demonstrating the value of atrazine in sweet corn production systems. Timely interrow cultivation in atrazine-free treatments did not consistently improve weed control. Only two atrazine-free treatments consistently resulted in weed control and crop yield comparable to standard treatments with atrazine POST: treatments with tembotrione POST either with or without interrow cultivation. Additional atrazine-free treatments with topramezone applied POST worked well in Oregon where small-seeded weed species were prevalent. This work demonstrates that certain atrazine-free weed management systems, based on input from the sweet corn growers and processors who would adopt this technology, are comparable in performance to standard atrazine-containing weed management systems.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Arslan, Zubeyde Filiz</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="z">md5:9a3fe8b5210696331dfe9f98415a42de</subfield>
    <subfield code="s">182</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.trrecord/57169/files/bib-3878f4b8-2d2a-425b-9fa3-31cb496d8244.txt</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210316001410.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2016-01-01</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.1614/WS-D-16-00001.1</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Alternatives to Atrazine for Weed Management in Processing Sweet Corn</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="v">64</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">WEED SCIENCE</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">531-539</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">3</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Williams, Martin M., II</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">USDA ARS, Global Change &amp; Photosynth Res, 1102 S Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 USA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Becker, Roger</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">Univ Minnesota, Dept Agron &amp; Plant Genet, 411 Borlaug Hall,1991 Upper Buford Circle, St Paul, MN 55108 USA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Fritz, Vincent A.</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">Univ Minnesota, Southern Res &amp; Outreach Ctr, Dept Hort Sci, 35838 120th St, Waseca, MN 56093 USA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Peachey, R. Ed</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">Oregon State Univ, Dept Hort, 4017 Ag &amp; Life Sci Bldg, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Rabaey, Tom L.</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">Gen Mills Agr Res, 1201 N 4th St, Le Sueur, MN 56058 USA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="001">57169</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-tubitak-destekli-proje-yayinlari</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>