1 Ocak 2016 Dergi makalesi Açık Erişim

Arslan, Zubeyde Filiz; Williams, Martin M., II; Becker, Roger; Fritz, Vincent A.; Peachey, R. Ed; Rabaey, Tom L.

JSON-LD (schema.org)

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org/", 
  "@id": 57169, 
  "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
  "creator": [
    {
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "Arslan, Zubeyde Filiz"
    }, 
    {
      "@type": "Person", 
      "affiliation": "USDA ARS, Global Change & Photosynth Res, 1102 S Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 USA", 
      "name": "Williams, Martin M., II"
    }, 
    {
      "@type": "Person", 
      "affiliation": "Univ Minnesota, Dept Agron & Plant Genet, 411 Borlaug Hall,1991 Upper Buford Circle, St Paul, MN 55108 USA", 
      "name": "Becker, Roger"
    }, 
    {
      "@type": "Person", 
      "affiliation": "Univ Minnesota, Southern Res & Outreach Ctr, Dept Hort Sci, 35838 120th St, Waseca, MN 56093 USA", 
      "name": "Fritz, Vincent A."
    }, 
    {
      "@type": "Person", 
      "affiliation": "Oregon State Univ, Dept Hort, 4017 Ag & Life Sci Bldg, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA", 
      "name": "Peachey, R. Ed"
    }, 
    {
      "@type": "Person", 
      "affiliation": "Gen Mills Agr Res, 1201 N 4th St, Le Sueur, MN 56058 USA", 
      "name": "Rabaey, Tom L."
    }
  ], 
  "datePublished": "2016-01-01", 
  "description": "Atrazine has been the most widely used herbicide in North American processing sweet corn for decades; however, increased restrictions in recent years have reduced or eliminated atrazine use in certain production areas. The objective of this study was to identify the best stakeholder-derived weed management alternatives to atrazine in processing sweet corn. In field trials throughout the major production areas of processing sweet corn, including three states over 4 yr, 12 atrazine-free weed management treatments were compared to three standard atrazine-containing treatments and a weed-free check. Treatments varied with respect to herbicide mode of action, herbicide application timing, and interrow cultivation. All treatments included a PRE application of dimethenamid. No single weed species occurred across all sites; however, weeds observed in two or more sites included common lambsquarters, giant ragweed, morningglory species, velvetleaf, and wild-proso millet. Standard treatments containing both atrazine and mesotrione POST provided the most efficacious weed control among treatments and resulted in crop yields comparable to the weed-free check, thus demonstrating the value of atrazine in sweet corn production systems. Timely interrow cultivation in atrazine-free treatments did not consistently improve weed control. Only two atrazine-free treatments consistently resulted in weed control and crop yield comparable to standard treatments with atrazine POST: treatments with tembotrione POST either with or without interrow cultivation. Additional atrazine-free treatments with topramezone applied POST worked well in Oregon where small-seeded weed species were prevalent. This work demonstrates that certain atrazine-free weed management systems, based on input from the sweet corn growers and processors who would adopt this technology, are comparable in performance to standard atrazine-containing weed management systems.", 
  "headline": "Alternatives to Atrazine for Weed Management in Processing Sweet Corn", 
  "identifier": 57169, 
  "image": "https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/static/img/logo/aperta_logo_with_icon.svg", 
  "license": "http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by", 
  "name": "Alternatives to Atrazine for Weed Management in Processing Sweet Corn", 
  "url": "https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/57169"
}