1 Ocak 2016 Dergi makalesi Açık Erişim

Tarhan, Ayca; Turetken, Oktay; Reijers, Hajo A.

MARC21 XML

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Turetken, Oktay</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn &amp; Innovat Sci, Den Dolech 2, NL-5612 AZ Eindhoven, Netherlands</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Reijers, Hajo A.</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Comp Sci, De Boelelaan 1081, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="c">122-134</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">75</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-tubitak-destekli-proje-yayinlari</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.1016/j.infsof.2016.01.010</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Business process maturity models: A systematic literature review</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Tarhan, Ayca</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">Hacettepe Univ, Dept Comp Engn, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:54189</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-tubitak-destekli-proje-yayinlari</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2016-01-01</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.trrecord/54189/files/bib-90a61e0e-2b35-4f1d-9ff2-9f3d7c8a6bb6.txt</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:22eff86057a911a2b7184419c19a6e74</subfield>
    <subfield code="s">168</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210315233332.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">54189</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Context: The number of maturity models proposed in the area of Business Process Management (BPM) has increased considerably in the last decade. However, there are a number of challenges, such as the limited empirical studies on their validation and a limited extent of actionable properties of these models in guiding their application. These challenges hinder the widespread usage of the maturity models in the BPM field.</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>