Tez Açık Erişim
{
"@context": "https://schema.org/",
"@id": 228122,
"@type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"creator": [
{
"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1436-7431",
"@type": "Person",
"affiliation": "\u0130stanbul \u00dcniversitesi",
"name": "Sa\u011fl\u0131k, \u00d6zhan"
}
],
"datePublished": "2021-11-03",
"description": "<p>Bu tezde elektronik imzal\u0131 (e-imzal\u0131) belgelerin delil de\u011feri ar\u015fivsel güvenilirlik aç\u0131s\u0131ndan incelenmektedir. Problem, kurumlar\u0131n elektronik belge yönetim sistemlerinde (EBYS) üretilip ar\u015fivlenen bu belgelerin zaman içerisinde özgünlü\u011fünü koruyamama riskidir. Bu durum, özellikle uzun süre saklanacak e-imzal\u0131 belgelerin delil de\u011ferini tehdit edip güvenilirliklerinden \u015füphe duyulmas\u0131na neden olabilir. Hipotez, “e-imza, zaman damgas\u0131 ve e-mühür gibi yap\u0131lar\u0131n k\u0131r\u0131lganl\u0131klar\u0131 ve kurumlar\u0131n gerekli denetimleri uygulamamas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 ar\u015fivlenen e-imzal\u0131 belgelerin uzun süre saklanmalar\u0131 sürecinde delil de\u011ferinde kay\u0131plar ya\u015fanabilir” \u015feklindedir. Tezde karma yöntem benimsenmi\u015f, nitel ve nicel ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Saha ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131n nitel k\u0131sm\u0131nda örneklem olarak Türkiye’de farkl\u0131 kurumlardaki e-belge yönetimi uygulamalar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmi\u015f uzmanlar seçilmi\u015ftir. Dokuz (9) ki\u015fi ile görü\u015fme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nicel k\u0131s\u0131mda ise Türkiye’de en çok kamu personeli çal\u0131\u015ft\u0131ran organizasyonlar\u0131n kümesi olan bakanl\u0131klar örnekleminden alt\u0131 (6) kurum incelenmi\u015ftir. Nitel ara\u015ft\u0131rmada literatür okumalar\u0131 neticesinde olu\u015fan kanaatlerin saha uzmanlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan da benimsenip benimsenmedi\u011fi sorulmu\u015f ve bu kanaatlerin biri hariç hepsi kabul görmü\u015ftür. Nicel ara\u015ft\u0131rmada ise ar\u015fivsel ba\u011f\u0131n muhafazas\u0131, gerekli teknolojik ko\u015fullar\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve belgelerin güvenilirli\u011finin korunmas\u0131na yönelik politika ve prosedürlerin ç\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin uygulamalar de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Kurumlar\u0131n bu alanlarda yeteri kadar prati\u011finin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Teknolojik ko\u015fullar\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131nda ise di\u011ferlerine göre daha ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olduklar\u0131 gözlenmi\u015ftir. Sahada e-belge yönetiminin süreç olarak de\u011ferlendirilmeyip, uygulama yaz\u0131l\u0131m\u0131ndan ibaretmi\u015f gibi görüldü\u011fü anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tezde e-imzal\u0131 belgelerin güvenilirli\u011finin korunup delil de\u011ferinin riske girmemesi için uzun dönemli korumaya yönelik politikalar\u0131n geli\u015ftirilmesi, gerekli teknolojik ko\u015fullar\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve belge hiyerar\u015fisi kopar\u0131lmadan ar\u015fivsel ba\u011f\u0131n muhafaza edilmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<br>\n<br>\nIn this thesis, the evidential value of electronic signed (e-signed) records is examined in terms of archival trustworthiness. The problem is that the risk of these records generated and archived in organizations’ electronic records management systems can not preserve their authenticity over time. Therefore it may threaten the evidential value of the particularly e-signed records that will be stored for a long time and cause doubts about their trustworthiness. The hypothesis is as follows: “Due to the fragility of structures such as e-signature, timestamp and e-seal and the failure of institutions to adopt necessary controls, the evidential value of archived e-signed records may be lost over time in the process of long term preservation.” A mixed method was adopted in the thesis, qualitative and quantitative research was conducted. In the qualitative part of the field research, experts who have evaluated e- records management practices in different organizations in Turkey were selected as a sample. Nine (9) people were interviewed. In the quantitative part, six (6) institutions from the ministries sample, which are the cluster of organizations that employ the most public personnel in Turkey, were examined. In the qualitative research, it was asked whether the experts also adopted the opinions that emerged from the literature readings, and it was understood that all of these opinions were accepted, except for one. In the quantitative research, practices of the institutions regarding the maintenance of the archival bond, provision of the necessary technological conditions and enacting of policies and procedures for the preservation of trusworthiness of the records were criticized. In the light of the answers given to the questions, it has been seen that the institutions do not have enough successful practices in these areas. Institutions are more successful in providing technological conditions. It has been understood that e- records management is not considered as a process, but adopted just as a software in the field. In order to preserve the trustworthiness of e-signed records and prevent their evidential value from risking, it has been conducted that policies and procedures for long-term preservation should be enacted, the necessary technological conditions should be provided, and the archival bond should be maintained without breaking the record hierarchy.</p>",
"hasPart": [
{
"@id": "https://doi.org/10.26650/bba.2021.16.993556",
"@type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"headline": "Elektronik belge y\u00f6netimi uygulamalar\u0131ndaki ko\u015fullar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda e-imzal\u0131 belgelerin delil de\u011ferinin ar\u015fivsel g\u00fcvenilirlik a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan incelenmesi",
"identifier": 228122,
"image": "https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/static/img/logo/aperta_logo_with_icon.svg",
"inLanguage": {
"@type": "Language",
"alternateName": "tur",
"name": "Turkish"
},
"keywords": [
"e-belge y\u00f6netimi",
"e-belge",
"e-ar\u015fiv",
"e-imza",
"e-imzal\u0131 belgelerin delil de\u011feri",
"ar\u015fivsel g\u00fcvenilirlik",
"ar\u015fivsel ba\u011f",
"organik ba\u011f",
"e-belgelerin dosyalanmas\u0131",
"diplomatik analiz",
"blokzincir teknolojisi",
"yapay zek\u00e2",
"yapay \u00f6\u011frenme",
"derin \u00f6\u011frenme",
"elektronik delil elde etme",
"e-records management",
"e-records",
"e-archive",
"e-signature",
"evidential value of e-signed records",
"archival trustworthiness",
"archival bond",
"organic bond",
"filing of e-records",
"diplomatic analysis",
"blockchain technology",
"artificial intelligence",
"machine learning",
"deep learning",
"digital forensics"
],
"license": "http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by-sa",
"name": "Elektronik belge y\u00f6netimi uygulamalar\u0131ndaki ko\u015fullar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda e-imzal\u0131 belgelerin delil de\u011ferinin ar\u015fivsel g\u00fcvenilirlik a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan incelenmesi",
"sameAs": [
"http://acikerisim.istanbul.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12627/167875",
"https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28689.97124"
],
"url": "https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/228122"
}
| Tüm sürümler | Bu sürüm | |
|---|---|---|
| Görüntülenme | 231 | 245 |
| İndirme | 495 | 495 |
| Veri hacmi | 2.0 GB | 2.0 GB |
| Tekil görüntülenme | 207 | 219 |
| Tekil indirme | 442 | 442 |