1 Ocak 2019 Dergi makalesi Açık Erişim

Shahzad, A. H.; Sattar, A.; Husnain, A.; Ahmad, I.; Ahmad, N.; Nak, D.; Nak, Y.

MARC21 XML

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Synchronization and Resynchronization as a Novel Approach for Improving Reproductive Performance of Postpartum Dairy Cows</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="p">PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">51</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">511-520</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="001">112070</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-tubitak-destekli-proje-yayinlari</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Estrus synchronization and suitable resynchronization intervention is crucial part of improved reproductive management in dairy industry. Our objectives were to appraise CIDR-EB based estrus synchronization and used CIDR-Ovsynch based resynch protocol in lactating Holstein cows at two different geographical locations. On location A, 160 postpartum cows were enrolled in standard CIDR-EB protocol. Cows were subjected to timed AI and randomly assigned into two groups: 1) control (n=70), subjected to AI on detected estrus (AIDE) from d18-d30 post TAI. Pregnancy rate was diagnosed on d30, d60 and d90 post TAI, 2) resynch (n=90) received CIDR from d14-d21 post TAI. On day 23, all cows received GnRH shot and open cows received remaining Ovsynch protocol. Blood was collected on d14,d16 and d30 for P4 profile. Cross-sectional area of luteal tissue was measured on d30 in pregnant animals in both groups. In experiment II, both control (n=64) and resynch (n=54) groups were similarly treated as in experiment I, without P4 profile and luteal cross-sectional area measurement. Pregnancy rate(PR) was compared by PROC FREQ of SAS. Effect of treatment on circulatory P4 profile and luteal tissue cross-sectional area were analyzed using GLM procedures (P&amp;lt;0.05). The PR on d30 in control (43%) and resynch (48%) groups was non-significant. On d60 and d90 overall PR was 44 and 73% (P=0.002) and 43 and 72% (P=0.002) while overall pregnancy loss was 11 and 4 /0 in control and resynch groups, respectively. In experiment II, PR on d30, d60 and d90 was 44 versus 54% (P=0.28), 53 versus 72% (P=0.03) and 50 versus 70% (P=0.025) in control and resynch groups with overall pregnancy loss of 14 and 3%. Mean P4 profile (ng/mL) was non-significant on d14 while significant on d16 and d30 post TAI in control and resynch groups. Mean luteal cross-sectional area on d30 post TAI has significant difference between both groups. In conclusion, a significant increase in overall PR in resynch group makes it an efficient reproductive management tool in comparison with control group.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Univ Vet &amp; Anim Sci, Theriogenol Dept, Lahore, Pakistan</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Sattar, A.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Univ Vet &amp; Anim Sci, Theriogenol Dept, Lahore, Pakistan</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Husnain, A.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Univ Vet &amp; Anim Sci, Physiol Dept, Lahore, Pakistan</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Ahmad, I.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Univ Vet &amp; Anim Sci, Theriogenol Dept, Lahore, Pakistan</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Ahmad, N.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Uudag Univ, Dept Obstet &amp; Gynecol, Bursa, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Nak, D.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Uudag Univ, Dept Obstet &amp; Gynecol, Bursa, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Nak, Y.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Univ Vet &amp; Anim Sci, Theriogenol Dept, Lahore, Pakistan</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Shahzad, A. H.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2019-01-01</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210420142841.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:112070</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-tubitak-destekli-proje-yayinlari</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="z">md5:ae8d3f4e9a7ead64663adb231682f944</subfield>
    <subfield code="s">253</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.trrecord/112070/files/bib-88ffc164-a6a1-4c99-8938-e482f08b9a70.txt</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.17582/journal.pjz/2019.51.2.511.520</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>