1 Ocak 2016 Konferans bildirisi Açık Erişim

Atil, Ilkay; Esen, Ersin

DataCite XML

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="URL">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/98455</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Atil, Ilkay</creatorName>
      <givenName>Ilkay</givenName>
      <familyName>Atil</familyName>
      <affiliation>TUBITAK UZAY, Goruntu Isleme Grubu, Ankara, Turkey</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Esen, Ersin</creatorName>
      <givenName>Ersin</givenName>
      <familyName>Esen</familyName>
      <affiliation>TUBITAK UZAY, Goruntu Isleme Grubu, Ankara, Turkey</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>Comparison Of Decision Fusion Methods For Steganalysis</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Aperta</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2016</publicationYear>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2016-01-01</date>
  </dates>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Conference paper</resourceType>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/98455</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.81043/aperta.98454</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsIdenticalTo">10.81043/aperta.98455</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by">Creative Commons Attribution</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">In this work, we compare the effect of using different decision fusion methods on the detection performance of a steganalysis system. It has been shown that different steganalysis features has different detection rates for different steganography methods. Therefore, steganalysis systems combine different steganalysis features to obtain the best detection rates. We compare four different fusion methods; feature concatenation, weighted fusion, neural networks and Support Vector Machines (SVM). We have observed that it is best to use a non-linear fusion method because SVM and neural networks gives the best detection rates when compared to linear fusion methods.</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>