1 Ocak 2015 Dergi makalesi Açık Erişim

Sezen, S. Metin; Yazar, Attila; Sengul, Haydar; Baytorun, Nafi; Dasgan, Yildiz; Akyildiz, Asiye; Tekin, Servet; Onder, Derya; Agcam, Erdal; Akhoundnejad, Yelderem; Gugercin, Ozkan

MARC21 XML

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Comparison of Drip- and Furrow-Irrigated red Pepper Yield, Yield Components, Quality and net Profit Generation</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="p">IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">64</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">4</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">546-556</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="001">77059</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-tubitak-destekli-proje-yayinlari</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The effects of different irrigation regimes on yield and quality and net profit of processing red pepper irrigated with drip and furrow irrigation systems under field conditions in the Mediterranean region of Turkey were evaluated over two years. The treatments for drip consist of full irrigation (DFI), deficit irrigation DDI-75, D-PRD-50, DF-PRD-50 and DDI-50, and for furrow: full irrigation (FFI), fixed alternative furrow (FAF-50) and PRD furrow (FPRD-50). FAF-50 and FPRD-50 received 50% of water applied to FFI. In FAF-50 the same furrows were irrigated while FPRD-50 was irrigated alternately. Irrigation methods and levels had a significant effect on total yield and some quality parameters of red pepper. Drip produced higher red pepper yields than furrow. The highest yield in the drip system was obtained from the DFI treatment followed by DDI-75, DDI-50 and DF-PRD-50 treatments. Although D-PRD-50, DF-PRD-50 and DDI-50 received the same amount of water, D-PRD-50 resulted in a higher yield. In furrow treatments, FFI resulted in the highest yield, followed by FPRD-50 and FAF-50. Water productivity (WP) decreased with increasing water quantity for both irrigation systems. Fruit weight, size and flesh thickness were higher in the DFI and FFI treatments. Full irrigation treatments (DFI and FFI) generated the highest net income. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, Ltd.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Cukurova Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Irrigat &amp; Agr Struct Sci, Adana, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Yazar, Attila</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Cukurova Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agr Econ, Adana, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Sengul, Haydar</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Cukurova Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Irrigat &amp; Agr Struct Sci, Adana, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Baytorun, Nafi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Cukurova Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Hort Sci, Adana, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Dasgan, Yildiz</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Cukurova Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Food Engn, Adana, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Akyildiz, Asiye</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Kahramanmaras Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Biosyst Engn, Kahramanmaras, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Tekin, Servet</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Cukurova Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Irrigat &amp; Agr Struct Sci, Adana, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Onder, Derya</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Cukurova Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Food Engn, Adana, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Agcam, Erdal</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Cukurova Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Hort Sci, Adana, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Akhoundnejad, Yelderem</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Cukurova Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Irrigat &amp; Agr Struct Sci, Adana, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Gugercin, Ozkan</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Tarsus Res Univ, Dept Water Management Soil &amp; Water Resources, Hort Res Stn, Tarsus, Mersin, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Sezen, S. Metin</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2015-01-01</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210316044751.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:77059</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-tubitak-destekli-proje-yayinlari</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="z">md5:ec3fdba4111e9133d5bcf1e3333b4961</subfield>
    <subfield code="s">299</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.trrecord/77059/files/bib-af9816bd-9524-4bb9-a79a-268408b2f4e8.txt</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.1002/ird.1915</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>