1 Ocak 2019 Dergi makalesi Açık Erişim

Kilic, K.; Kurtulus, I. L.; Eraslan, R.; Zararsiz, G.; Kesim, B.

MARC21 XML

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Effects of attachment type and palatal coverage on oral perception and patient satisfaction in maxillary implant-supported complete denture patients</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="p">NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">22</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">5</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">669-674</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="001">68499</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-tubitak-destekli-proje-yayinlari</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Aim: The effect of oral rehabilitation on the oral perception of implant-supported overdenture patients is a concern. This study evaluated the effects of the attachment type and palatal coverage on oral perception and patient satisfaction in maxillary implant-supported complete denture patients. Subjects and Methods: The correlation between oral perceptual ability (OPA) and patient satisfaction in three groups was investigated. Group I consisted of dentate individuals (n = 40), Group II consisted of maxillary implant-supported complete denture patients with bar attachments and palatal coverage (n = 12), and Group III of maxillary implant-supported complete denture patients with magnetic attachments and palatal coverage (n = 14). In addition, implant-supported maxillary overdentures with bar attachments, with (Group II; n = 12) and without (Group IV; n = 18) palatal coverage, were examined in terms of patient satisfaction and OPA. The relationship between OPA and patient satisfaction was assessed with the Turkish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-TR-14) satisfaction survey. To compare oral sensory function among the groups, tactile awareness and pressure awareness were assessed. Results: There was no significant difference in OHIP-TR-14 scores between Groups II and III. In addition, there was no correlation between oral tactile function and patient satisfaction in Groups II and III. For patients with maxillary bar-retained implant-supported overdentures, palatal coverage did not affect the correlation between OPA and patient satisfaction, lateral pressure threshold, or tactile thickness threshold. Conclusion: According to the results of the study, whether maxillary implant-supported overdentures were made with a bar- or magnetic-type retainer, and whether bar-retained implant-supported overdentures had an open or closed palate did not affect the correlation between patient satisfaction and oral perception.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Erciyes Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Kayseri, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Kurtulus, I. L.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Erciyes Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Kayseri, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Eraslan, R.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Erciyes Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat, Kayseri, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Zararsiz, G.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Yeni Yuzyil Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Istanbul, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Kesim, B.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Erciyes Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Kayseri, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Kilic, K.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2019-01-01</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210316024909.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:68499</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-tubitak-destekli-proje-yayinlari</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="z">md5:806379ca8c46b288579a9cd2de648df7</subfield>
    <subfield code="s">275</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.trrecord/68499/files/bib-cb9b60a1-186a-4583-8f89-51e8a8406f39.txt</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.4103/njcp.njcp_14_19</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>