1 Ocak 2016 Dergi makalesi Açık Erişim

Felekoglu, Burak; Tosun-Felekoglu, Kamile; Keskinates, Muhammer; Godek, Eren

MARC21 XML

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">57061</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="v">121</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">423-428</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210316001243.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The compatibility of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and high tenacity polypropylene (HTPP) fibers with various cementitious matrices in terms of bending performance has been investigated. Matrices were prepared at three water to binder (W/B) ratios. In order to compare the flaw tolerancy of matrices, natural flaw structure of half of the specimens were modified by using poly-ethylene beads (at 3 mm diameter). The effects of fiber type, water/binder (W/B) ratio and flaw structure modification on the multiple-cracking behavior of bending composites were determined under flexural loads. The matrix phase of composites is mainly composed of ordinary Portland cement (OPC), Metakaolin (M), and limestone powder, respectively. Prismatic specimens (25 x 60 x 300 mm) have been prepared and subjected to 4-point loading test 28 days after specimen preparation. Flexural properties, multiple cracking potentials, crack properties (by means of number and width) of composites were compared. Results showed that, HTPP fibers seem more advantageous compared to PVA fibers in terms of flaw tolerancy with metakaolin based matrices. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A comparative study on the compatibility of PVA and HTPP fibers with various cementitious matrices under flexural loads</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">user-tubitak-destekli-proje-yayinlari</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:57061</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Izmir, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Felekoglu, Burak</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-tubitak-destekli-proje-yayinlari</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="z">md5:98e0f9cc03e9d7e48705d4d1088bcbc6</subfield>
    <subfield code="s">248</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.trrecord/57061/files/bib-b25ddc98-f9b6-49ec-89f4-ab4217c334a6.txt</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.004</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Izmir, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Tosun-Felekoglu, Kamile</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Grad Sch Nat &amp; Appl Sci, Constr Mat Program, Izmir, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Keskinates, Muhammer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Grad Sch Nat &amp; Appl Sci, Constr Mat Program, Izmir, Turkey</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Godek, Eren</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2016-01-01</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>