1 Ocak 2017 Konferans bildirisi Açık Erişim

Tuncel, Aykut; Ozdag, Ozkan Cevdet; Pamuk, Eren; Akgun, Mustafa

DataCite XML

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="URL">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/48325</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Tuncel, Aykut</creatorName>
      <givenName>Aykut</givenName>
      <familyName>Tuncel</familyName>
      <affiliation>Dokuz Eylul Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Geophys Engn, Izmir, Turkey</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Ozdag, Ozkan Cevdet</creatorName>
      <givenName>Ozkan Cevdet</givenName>
      <familyName>Ozdag</familyName>
      <affiliation>Dokuz Eylul Univ, Aegean Implementat &amp; Res Ctr, Izmir, Turkey</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Pamuk, Eren</creatorName>
      <givenName>Eren</givenName>
      <familyName>Pamuk</familyName>
      <affiliation>Dokuz Eylul Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Geophys Engn, Izmir, Turkey</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Akgun, Mustafa</creatorName>
      <givenName>Mustafa</givenName>
      <familyName>Akgun</familyName>
      <affiliation>Dokuz Eylul Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Geophys Engn, Izmir, Turkey</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>Comparison Of The Soil Dynamic Amplification Factor And Soil Amplification By Using Microtremor And Masw Methods Respectively</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Aperta</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2017</publicationYear>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2017-01-01</date>
  </dates>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Conference paper</resourceType>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/48325</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsIdenticalTo">10.1088/1755-1315/95/3/032006</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by">Creative Commons Attribution</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">Single Station Microtremor method, which is widely used nowadays, is an effective and easy applicable method. In this study, dynamic amplification factor distributions of the study area were obtained using scenario earthquake parameters with single station microtremor data gathered at 112 points. In addition, a surface wave active method, which is known as MASW (Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves), was applied at 43 profiles to calculate the soil amplification values. Dynamic amplification factor (DAF), soil amplification, the predominant soil period (PSP), geology and topography data of the study area were analysed together. Dynamic amplification factor and soil amplification values were obtained 2 or higher at about sea level parts of the study area which are generally composed of alluvial units. Additionally, in high altitude regions that are composed of volcanic rocks, relatively lower dynamic amplification factor and soil amplification values were obtained. The minimum amplification value in the study area was 1.15, while the maximum amplification value was 3.05 according to the dynamic amplification results and the soil amplification values were between 1.16 and 3.85 in harmony. It is seen that the obtained DAF values and the soil amplification values calculated from the seismic velocities are very similar to each other numerically and regionally. Because of this, it is concluded that the values of the soil amplification obtained by the MASW method and the calculated DAF values in this study are in harmony with each other. Although the depths of research in these two calculation methods are different from each other, the similarity of the results allows us to arrive at the result of how effective the ground layer is on the amplification. It has a great importance to calculate the amplification values and other dynamic parameters by in situ measurements for a planned plot because geological units can vary even at very short distances in heterogeneously distributed areas.</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>