Dergi makalesi Açık Erişim
Aksoy, T.; Narinc, D.; Onenc, A.; Curek, D. Ilaslan
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"> <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader> <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">Narinc, D.</subfield> <subfield code="u">Akdeniz Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Anim Sci, TR-07058 Antalya, Turkey</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">Onenc, A.</subfield> <subfield code="u">Namik Kemal Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Anim Sci, TR-59030 Tekirdag, Turkey</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">Curek, D. Ilaslan</subfield> <subfield code="u">Res & Dev Project Branch Off, Antalya Metropolitan Municipal, Antalya, Turkey</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4"> <subfield code="p">TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION</subfield> <subfield code="v">53</subfield> <subfield code="n">3</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">user-tubitak-destekli-proje-yayinlari</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution</subfield> <subfield code="u">http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11250-021-02791-3</subfield> <subfield code="2">doi</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">Effects of season, genotype and rearing system on some meat quality traits for broilers raised in semi-intensive systems</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">Aksoy, T.</subfield> <subfield code="u">Akdeniz Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Anim Sci, TR-07058 Antalya, Turkey</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O"> <subfield code="o">oai:aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr:234820</subfield> <subfield code="p">user-tubitak-destekli-proje-yayinlari</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7"> <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield> <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="c">2021-01-01</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "> <subfield code="u">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.trrecord/234820/files/bib-5dc269af-11dd-409c-bd21-ed1be0fdcb3a.txt</subfield> <subfield code="z">md5:05923d33aa8ed061cf487e1444d357be</subfield> <subfield code="s">220</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="l">open</subfield> </datafield> <controlfield tag="005">20221007090747.0</controlfield> <controlfield tag="001">234820</controlfield> <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">publication</subfield> <subfield code="b">article</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">We compared fast-growing and slow-growing broilers raised in extensive indoor, free-range, and traditional free-range systems in terms of meat quality in spring and summer. Five different semi-intensive broiler production applications (fast- in extensive indoor, slow- in extensive indoor, fast- in free-range, slow- in free-range and slow- in traditional free-range) were used according to EU standards. Extensive indoor and free-range birds were slaughtered at 57 days of age and traditional free-range chickens at 82 days. The higher (P&lt;0.05) skin yellowness (b*) values found in spring compared to summer may have been due to better pasture conditions in spring. The pH(24) value of breast meat during the summer period was higher (P&lt;0.05) than that in spring, but lightness (L*) was similar. Thawing and cooking losses were higher (P&lt;0.05) in breast meat samples from the summer experiment. The season affected (P&lt;0.05) all sensory attributes of breast meat; spring samples were appreciated more in terms of all the features discussed. Regarding the skin b* value, the highest average value was detected for slow chickens in the slow- in free-range and traditional free-range groups, most likely because slow chickens spent more time grazing. Fast- showed higher pH(24) values than slow- (P&lt;0.05) in extensive indoor and free-range groups. We did not observe differences in pH(24) due to grazing in fast-, but grazing slow- showed lower pH(24) values than their indoor counterparts. Further, in the extensive indoor system, both genotypes were similar in terms of breast meat L* and b*, whereas slow- in the free-range system showed higher (P&lt;0.05) averages than fast-. Based on our results, the traditional grazing system has a positive impact on meat sensory features.</subfield> </datafield> </record>
Görüntülenme | 5 |
İndirme | 4 |
Veri hacmi | 880 Bytes |
Tekil görüntülenme | 4 |
Tekil indirme | 4 |