1 Ocak 2021 Dergi makalesi Açık Erişim

Ozturk, Kemal; Savaskan, Burcu; Abdioglu, Murat; Cansiz, Ahmet; Dilek, Durukan Burak; Karaahmet, Zekeriya

JSON-LD (schema.org)

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org/", 
  "@id": 234346, 
  "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
  "creator": [
    {
      "@type": "Person", 
      "affiliation": "Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Phys, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey", 
      "name": "Ozturk, Kemal"
    }, 
    {
      "@type": "Person", 
      "affiliation": "Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Technol, Dept Energy Syst Engn, TR-61800 Trabzon, Turkey", 
      "name": "Savaskan, Burcu"
    }, 
    {
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "Abdioglu, Murat"
    }, 
    {
      "@type": "Person", 
      "affiliation": "Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Elect & Elect, Elect Engn Dept, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey", 
      "name": "Cansiz, Ahmet"
    }, 
    {
      "@type": "Person", 
      "affiliation": "Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey", 
      "name": "Dilek, Durukan Burak"
    }, 
    {
      "@type": "Person", 
      "affiliation": "Karadeniz Tech Univ, Grad Sch Sci, Dept Renewable Energy Sources Technol, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey", 
      "name": "Karaahmet, Zekeriya"
    }
  ], 
  "datePublished": "2021-01-01", 
  "description": "In this study, a detailed static and dynamic experimental studies were carried out in different cooling heights (CH) by using two different multi-surface HTS-PMG arrangements with horizontal (MS-H) and vertical (MS-V) geometries to determine the optimum magnetic force, static stiffness, dynamic response, and dynamic stiffness parameters of superconducting Maglev system. The maximum levitation force values (in CH = 25 mm) were obtained as 202 N and 84 N, respectively, with horizontal and vertical geometry HTS-PMG arrangements, while the maximum guidance force values (in CH = 5 mm) were obtained as -58 N and -22 N, respectively. Also, the vertical static (in CH = 25 mm) and dynamic stiffness (in CH = 5 mm) values were determined as 33.8 N/mm and 37.8 N/mm, respectively, for MS-H and 12.3 N/mm and 25.1 N/mm, respectively, for MS-V arrangements. The bigger levitation force, guidance force, and both static and dynamic magnetic stiffness values of MS-H arrangement with horizontal geometry than that of MS-V arrangement with vertical geometry indicate that the horizontal HTS-PMG geometry is more suitable for practical Maglev applications in terms of loading capacity and movement stability.", 
  "headline": "Comparing of the Magnetic Force Parameters of Superconducting Maglev System Using Horizontal and Vertical PMG Geometry in Multi-Surface HTS-PMG Arrangement", 
  "identifier": 234346, 
  "image": "https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/static/img/logo/aperta_logo_with_icon.svg", 
  "license": "http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by", 
  "name": "Comparing of the Magnetic Force Parameters of Superconducting Maglev System Using Horizontal and Vertical PMG Geometry in Multi-Surface HTS-PMG Arrangement", 
  "url": "https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/234346"
}