Published January 1, 2025 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Comparative Evaluation of HPLC and Capillary Electrophoresis in Intestinal Permeability of Oseltamivir Phosphate <i>via</i> Single-pass Intestinal Perfusion (SPIP) Method

  • 1. Usak Univ, Vocat Sch Hlth Serv, Dept Med Serv & Tech, TR-64100 Usak, Turkiye
  • 2. Usak Univ, Dept Chem, TR-64100 Usak, Turkiye
  • 3. Anadolu Univ, Fac Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Technol, TR-26470 Eskisehir, Turkiye
  • 4. Roger Williams Univ, Dept Chem & Phys, One Old Ferry Rd, Bristol, RI 02809 USA

Description

Introduction: Oseltamivir phosphate (OP), a widely used antiviral prodrug for influenza, requires accurate Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) classification to inform formulation and bioequivalence decisions. Despite its high solubility, the permeability characteristics of OP remain inadequately defined. Methods: This study evaluated the intestinal permeability of OP using the in situ Single-Pass Intestinal Perfusion (SPIP) model in male Sprague Dawley rats. Two validated analytical methods - High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and Capillary Zone Electrophoresis (CZE) were developed and compared. Metoprolol tartrate served as the high-permeability reference standard, and phenol red was used to monitor water flux. Permeability coefficients (P-eff) were calculated after validation of analytical methods per ICH guidelines. Results: The HPLC and CZE methods demonstrated excellent linearity (R-2 >= 0.999), precision (RSD < 0.9%), and accuracy (99.3-101.7%). The P-eff of OP was significantly lower than that of metoprolol, with the values of 0.14 +/- 0.06 & times; 10(-4) cm/s (HPLC) compared to 0.55 +/- 0.08 & times; 10(-4) cm/s, and 0.30 +/- 0.18 & times; 10(-4) cm/s (CZE) compared to 0.41 +/- 0.11 & times; 10(-4) cm/s, respectively. No statistical difference was found between the two methods (p > 0.05). HPLC provided superior sensitivity, while CZE offered operational and environmental advantages. Discussion: OP showed low intestinal permeability, supporting its BCS Class III classification and aligning with values for other low-permeability drugs. Both HPLC and CZE yielded consistent results, with HPLC providing greater sensitivity while CZE offered greener and cost-effective advantages. These findings confirm the utility of SPIP and highlight complementary roles of the two methods in permeability profiling. Conclusion: OP exhibited low permeability in rat jejunum, consistent with BCS Class III classification. The validated HPLC and CZE methods are effective for intestinal permeability studies, with HPLC recommended for regulatory purposes and CZE for green analytical applications.

Files

bib-b6aee382-c2e1-42df-97ac-ca9ed2ca2ced.txt

Files (260 Bytes)

Name Size Download all
md5:4c99fdb39eb10ccae2bdf95620661e8e
260 Bytes Preview Download