Published January 1, 2018
| Version v1
Journal article
Open
An evaluation of canonical forms for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval
Creators
- 1. Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
- 2. Avatar Sci Hunan Co, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
- 3. Peking Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
- 4. South China Univ Technol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
- 5. Technion Israel Inst Technol, Haifa, Israel
- 6. Middle East Tech Univ, Ankara, Turkey
- 7. Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
Description
Canonical forms attempt to factor out a non-rigid shape's pose, giving a pose-neutral shape. This opens up the possibility of using methods originally designed for rigid shape retrieval for the task of non-rigid shape retrieval. We extend our recent benchmark for testing canonical form algorithms. Our new benchmark is used to evaluate a greater number of state-of-the-art canonical forms, on five recent non-rigid retrieval datasets, within two different retrieval frameworks. A total of fifteen different canonical form methods are compared. We find that the difference in retrieval accuracy between different canonical form methods is small, but varies significantly across different datasets. We also find that efficiency is the main difference between the methods.
Files
bib-dad71207-a351-4f57-a31e-255a8443515c.txt
Files
(241 Bytes)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:b672df98c9a916c902126b33051fbf17
|
241 Bytes | Preview Download |