Thermal shock effects on the microstructure and mechanical properties of iron-based composites reinforced by in-situ Fe 2 B/FeB ceramic phases
- 1. Igdir Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-76000 Igdir, Turkiye
- 2. Erciyes Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-38039 Kayseri, Turkiye
- 3. Erciyes Univ, Dept Ind Design Engn, TR-38039 Kayseri, Turkiye
Description
Recently, high-temperature composites reinforced with in-situ phases have been developed as a new class of composites for harsh environments. The behaviour of these composites under sudden heating and cooling conditions is greatly influenced by the type and fraction of components. The aim of this study is to investigate the microstructural properties and mechanical response of iron based composites after thermal shock cycling. The fabrication process involved in-situ powder metallurgy (IPM) sintering of Fe - B 4 C starting powders. The samples were subjected to thermal shock with a constant temperature differences ( Delta T: 600 degrees C) and varied cycles (N: 1 - 50). Comparison of microstructural changes and mechanical behaviour before and after thermal shock has been carried out. The boron atoms released from the initial B 4 C generated diffusion zones in the matrix dominated by iron boride phases (Fe 2 B/FeB). An effective matrix-reinforcement interface has been created by in-situ powder metallurgy, where boride phases are almost homogeneously distributed in the iron matrix. While the hardness of the composites was significantly developed by the Fe 2 B/FeB phases, the addition of B 4 C resulted in a reduction in the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE). The in-situ phases contributed in the minimisation of the coefficient mismatch by balancing the thermal expansion coefficients between iron and the initial B 4 C. Under the influence of thermal shock, microcracks and then macrocracks formed on the sample surfaces, increasing in width and depth with thermal cycles. This resulted in accelerated fracture damage under post-thermal loading. Both the impact and flexural strengths of the samples were significantly reduced as the number of thermal cycles increased. Although the 20% B 4 C reinforced composite provided maximum hardness, it showed poor resistance to thermal loading. The best results for mechanical loads were achieved by the 5% B 4 C reinforced composite, which showed no cracks even after 50 thermal cycling.
Files
bib-a85e2f11-f6df-4dd0-97e6-d813e46641d9.txt
Files
(240 Bytes)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:77ef267985388b469ac13f4a069e98d6
|
240 Bytes | Preview Download |