Published January 1, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Swift/UVOT follow-up of gravitational wave alerts in the O3 era

  • 1. NASA, Astrophys Sci Div, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
  • 2. Univ Coll London, Mullard Space Sci Lab, Dorking RH5 6NT, Surrey, England
  • 3. Texas A&M Univ, George P & Cynthia Woods Mitchell Inst Fundamenta, Dept Phys & Astron, Mitchell Phys Bldg, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
  • 4. Istanbul Univ, Dept Astron & Space Sci, TR-34119 Istanbul, Turkey
  • 5. Univ Leicester, Sch Phys & Astron, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
  • 6. Penn State Univ, Dept Astron & Astrophys, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
  • 7. Univ Toronto, Dept Astron & Astrophys, Toronto, ON M5S 3H4, Canada
  • 8. IASF Palermo, INAF, Via Ugo La Malfa 153, I-90146 Palermo, Italy
  • 9. Osserv Astron Brera, INAE, Via Bianchi 46, I-23807 Merate, Italy

Description

In this paper, we report on the observational performance of the Swift Ultra-violet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) in response to the gravitational wave (GW) alerts announced by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory and the Advanced Virgo detector during the O3 period. We provide the observational strategy for follow-up of GW alerts and provide an overview of the processing and analysis of candidate optical/UV sources. For the O3 period, we also provide a statistical overview and report on serendipitous sources discovered by Swift/UVOT. Swift followed 18 GW candidate alerts, with UVOT observing a total of 424 deg(2). We found 27 sources that changed in magnitude at the 3 sigma level compared with archival u- or g-band catalogued values. Swift/UVOT also followed up a further 13 sources reported by other facilities during the O3 period. Using catalogue information, we divided these 40 sources into five initial classifications: 11 candidate active galactic nuclei (AGNs)/quasars, three cataclysmic variables (CVs), nine supernovae, 11 unidentified sources that had archival photometry, and six uncatalogued sources for which no archival photometry was available. We have no strong evidence to identify any of these transients as counterparts to the GW events. The 17 unclassified sources are likely a mix of AGN and a class of fast-evolving transient, and one source may be a CV.

Files

bib-ef463ba0-ced2-4e11-9fc8-d90161801332.txt

Files (405 Bytes)

Name Size Download all
md5:2078e7dbf32b3396214c36a8704b6782
405 Bytes Preview Download