Published January 1, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Dose distrubution evaluation of different dental implants on a real human dry-skull model for head and neck cancer radiotherapy

  • 1. Gazi Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkey
  • 2. Ankara Univ, Dept Engn Phys, Fac Engn, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
  • 3. Yeditepe Univ, Dept Nucl Med, Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 4. Ankara Univ, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Fac Dent, Ankara, Turkey
  • 5. Hlth Sci Univ, Gulhane Fac Med, Radiat Oncol Dept, Ankara, Turkey

Description

Objectives: In this study, the effect of different dental implant materials on dose distribution in head and neck cancer radiotherapy planning was investigated in a real human dry-skull taken from cadaver. Methods: The effect of Root-shaped Yttrium (Y) stabilized tetragonal Zr polycrystalline (Y-TZP), Titanium (Ti), Alumina (Al2O3) and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) dental implants on dose distribution was investigated by three different methods; Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, Eclipse Treatment Planning System's (TPS) Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) algorithm and Thermoluminescence Dosimeter (TLD). The 6 MV photon beam simulation was performed for the Varian 2300 C/D linear accelerator using the EGSnrc based BEAMnrc MC Code. To perform MC simulation on skull phantom, phantom CT images with extended CT scale were imported to BEAMnrc/EGSnrc MC code via CTCREATE code. Results: According to the dose distribution measurement in dry skull, the calculated dose differences between PBC and MC algorithms were in the range of 0.6-4.5% whereas the dose difference between MC and TLD were in the range of 1,1-14.6% range depending on implant material. The PBC calculated dose increase difference range confirmed with TLD measurements was between 1.7% and 19.8%. The PBC algorithm could not fully determine the dose due to backscattering caused by dental implants. This is probably due to the limitations and shortcomings of the PBC algorithm. Conclusion: The maximum dose increase was observed for the Y-TZP dental implant material, which has the highest physical density. No significant dose increase was observed for the PEEK implant probably due to the low physical density of implants close to the physical density of water.

Files

bib-3236c5af-7c4e-4663-b8d2-9d06d3752275.txt

Files (236 Bytes)

Name Size Download all
md5:b63b98c7fb36ed57f42d355745547abb
236 Bytes Preview Download