Published January 1, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Synthesis, biological evaluation (antioxidant, antimicrobial, enzyme inhibition, and cytotoxic) and molecular docking study of hydroxy methoxy benzoin/benzil analogous

  • 1. Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Pharm, Dept Pharmacognosy, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey
  • 2. Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Chem, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey
  • 3. Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Pharm, Dept Biochem, F-61080 Trabzon, Turkey
  • 4. Recep Tayyip Erdogan Univ, Fac Arts & Sci, Dept Biol, TR-53100 Rize, Turkey
  • 5. Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Chem, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey
  • 6. Bozok Univ, Fac Med, Dept Basic Med Sci, TR-66900 Yozgat, Turkey
  • 7. Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey

Description

In this work, due to the biological activity evaluation, a series of hydroxy methoxy benzoins (1-8), benzils (10-16) and methoxy benzoin/benzil-O-beta-D-glucosides (17-28) were synthesized. Antioxidant (FRAP, CUPRAC, DPPH), antimicrobial (16 microorganisms, and two yeast), enzyme inhibition (alpha-amylase, alpha-glucosidase, AChE, BChE, and tyrosinase) of all synthesized benzoin/benzil analogs were investigated. Benzoins (1-8) showed the most effective antioxidant properties compared to all three methods. Compound 28 against alpha-amylase, compound 9 against alpha-glucosidase, compound 11 against AChE, compound 2 against BChE, and compound 13 against tyrosinase showed the best activities with the better or similar IC50 values as used standards. Hydroxy methoxy benzoin compounds (1-8) among all four groups were seen as the most effective against the tested microorganism. Molecular docking analysis showed that all tested compounds 1-28 (0.01-2.22 mu M) had the best binding affinity against AChE enzyme. Cytotoxic effects of the many of compounds (1-16, 21, and 24) also investigated and it was found that they caused different effects in different cells. The LDH tests of compounds 1a + b, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 21, and 24, seemed to be effective compared to the positive control cisplatin. The cytotoxicity of compounds 6 (9.24%) for MCF7 cancer cells, 8 (5.16%) and 4 (8.26%) for HT29 cancer cells, 24 (9.84%) for Hep3B cells and 8 (8.52%), 7 (5.70%), 4 (6.94) and 9 (7.22%) for C6 cells were at normal values. And also cytotoxic activity of four compounds (5, 9, 21, and 24) among the all synthetic groups, were evaluated to the HeLa and RPE. Compound 5 showed anticancer activity on HeLa and RPE cancer cells as much as or better than cisplatin which was used as standard.

Files

bib-79dcfc80-6b27-451c-b7a4-e2395b30000a.txt

Files (355 Bytes)

Name Size Download all
md5:99b765c2844a518e7efa7ffb5d54faae
355 Bytes Preview Download