Published January 1, 2015
| Version v1
Journal article
Open
Ca-Cu looping process for CO2 capture from a power plant and its comparison with Ca-looping, oxy-combustion and amine-based CO2 capture processes
Creators
- 1. Univ Edinburgh, Sch Engn, Scottish Carbon Capture & Storage Ctr, Edinburgh EH9 3JL, Midlothian, Scotland
- 2. Univ Ottawa, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
- 3. CanmetENERGY, Nat Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 1M1, Canada
- 4. ETH, Lab Energy Sci & Engn, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Description
This study reports the technical performance of an advanced configuration of the calcium looping (Ca-looping) process, called Ca-Cu looping, for the reduction of CO2 emissions from a subcritical CFB power plant with a net output of 250 MWe. In this new process concept, the thermal power requirement in the calciner is satisfied using a chemical looping combustion cycle. Thus, the power consumption associated with the air separation unit that is required in the conventional Ca-looping process scheme can be eliminated. The reference power plant has also been modified to integrate oxy-combustion, Ca-looping and amine scrubbing technologies for comparison. The fully integrated process flowsheets have been simulated using Honeywell's UniSim Design Suit R400. For a more accurate prediction of the CO2 capture efficiency in the carbonator of the Ca-Cu looping process, the experimentally obtained cyclic activity of a novel copper-functionalised, calcium-based composite sorbent has been implemented yielding a rigorous carbonator model. The process simulations also include a comprehensive analysis of the CO2 compression and purification unit as well as a heat exchanger network optimized using pinch analysis for the recovery of excess heat from the high temperature gas and solid streams available in the Ca-looping and Ca-Cu looping processes. Compared to the energy penalty of 10.5 percentage points for a conventional amine scrubbing configuration, the Ca-Cu looping process evaluated in this study achieves the same overall CO2 capture efficiency with a significantly reduced energy penalty of 3.5 percentage points; the lowest value for all CO2 capture architectures assessed here. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Files
bib-85caf3fb-1a71-4ef1-ac7e-abf939c66b73.txt
Files
(306 Bytes)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:06c186d6f02a574d69bbd5ff415319c2
|
306 Bytes | Preview Download |