Dergi makalesi Açık Erişim
Yücel, Levent;
Büyükatalay, Zahide Çiler;
Özgürsoy, Ozan Bağış
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
<identifier identifierType="URL">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/228076</identifier>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Yücel, Levent</creatorName>
<givenName>Levent</givenName>
<familyName>Yücel</familyName>
<nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0001-9045-4636</nameIdentifier>
<affiliation>University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara, Turkey</affiliation>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName>Büyükatalay, Zahide Çiler</creatorName>
<givenName>Zahide Çiler</givenName>
<familyName>Büyükatalay</familyName>
<nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0002-0992-0079</nameIdentifier>
<affiliation>Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara, Turkey</affiliation>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName>Özgürsoy, Ozan Bağış</creatorName>
<givenName>Ozan Bağış</givenName>
<familyName>Özgürsoy</familyName>
<nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0002-2300-9070</nameIdentifier>
<affiliation>Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara, Turkey</affiliation>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title>Predictors Of Success In Sialendoscopy</title>
</titles>
<publisher>Aperta</publisher>
<publicationYear>2021</publicationYear>
<subjects>
<subject>Diagnosis</subject>
<subject>Endoscopy</subject>
<subject>Therapeutics</subject>
<subject>Salivary Glands</subject>
<subject>Salivary Gland Calculi</subject>
</subjects>
<dates>
<date dateType="Issued">2021-08-17</date>
</dates>
<language>en</language>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Journal article</resourceType>
<alternateIdentifiers>
<alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/228076</alternateIdentifier>
</alternateIdentifiers>
<relatedIdentifiers>
<relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsIdenticalTo">10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.83723</relatedIdentifier>
</relatedIdentifiers>
<rightsList>
<rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives</rights>
<rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
</rightsList>
<descriptions>
<description descriptionType="Abstract"><p>Objectives: Sialolithiasis accounts for about 50% of major salivary gland diseases. Sialendoscopy allows direct visualization of the salivary duct through a small-caliber endoscope and treatment of sialolithiasis. In spite of developing technologies and techniques, there may be some difficulties or limitations in the sialendoscopic approach. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of sialendoscopic procedures at our department.</p>
<p>Materials and Methods: Medical records of 34 patients, who underwent sialendoscopy between December 2015 and September 2018, were retrospectively reviewed, and surgical data, success rates, stone characteristics and complications were noted.</p>
<p>Results: Sialendoscopy was performed in the submandibular gland in 26 (76.5%) patients and in the parotid gland in the remaining 8 (23.5%) patients. The mean sialolith size and number were 6.5 mm and 1.5, respectively. The sialoliths were located in the duct in 22 (64.7%) patients and in the hilum in 12 (35.3%) patients. The sialoliths were mobile in 15 (44.1%) patients and immobile in 11 (32.4%) patients. Diagnostic and therapeutic sialendoscopy were successfully performed in 33 (97.1%) patients and 25 (73.5%) patients, respectively. There was not statistically significant difference between success rates and sialolith dimensions (p&gt;0.05); however, a statistically significant difference was found between success rates when the localization and mobility of sialoliths were taken into account (p=0.004, p=0.018).</p>
<p>Conclusion: Sialendoscopy is a minimally invasive and reliable surgical technique in the treatment of sialolithiasis, which can be affected by many factors such as size, localization, mobility, number of sialoliths, surgeon&rsquo;s experience, and the availability of the sialendoscopic equipment.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p></description>
</descriptions>
</resource>
| Görüntülenme | 98 |
| İndirme | 67 |
| Veri hacmi | 42.7 MB |
| Tekil görüntülenme | 89 |
| Tekil indirme | 64 |